Search for: "U.S. Army Corps of Engineers" Results 421 - 440 of 1,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2012, 11:00 am
Third, we must reform the federal flood protection process that the Army Corps of Engineers currently operates under. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:22 am by Ben Rubin
  Shortly after the construction of the Dam in 1948, the Army Corps of Engineers adopted a schedule of release rates. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
<> Plan to stop invasive species in Lake Michigan is paused - The U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 9:00 am
Department of Defense concerning the Waters of the United States Rule (“Rule”) promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) in 2015. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:37 am by WIMS
<> Corps Releases Latest GLMRIS Newsletter - The U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:43 pm by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has published and released for comment the Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) Control Paper: Inventory of Available Controls for Aquatic Nuisance Species of Concern ? [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 4:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Army Corps of Engineers and Environmental Protection Agency first adopted expansive interpretations of their regulatory authority under the CWA. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:58 am by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers to issue nationwide permits under § 404(e) of the Clean Water Act to authorize activities involving discharge of dredged or fill material in U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 8:39 am by Stephen D. Tobin
Army Corps of Engineers (the government) contracted for the construction of a building at an Army depot in Pennsylvania. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:15 am
BogueAdmonishing appellant for 20 years of blatant disregard for the Army Corps of Engineers (&ldquo;Corps&rdquo;) and the Clean Water Act (&ldquo;CWA&rdquo;), the Ninth Circuit upheld the Idaho district court&rsquo;s verdict finding appellant criminally liable for violations of the Clean Water Act in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:21 am by Katherine McCoy
By Lesley Foxhall Pietras On March 25, 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) jointly released a proposed rule purporting to clarify the scope of the “waters of the United States” protected under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:38 am by Sophie Luskin
FBI whistleblowers Jane Turner and Fred Whitehurst, Enron whistleblower Sherron Watkins, Army Corps of Engineers whistleblower Bunnatine Greenhouse, and Second Chance body armor whistleblower Aaron Westrick are spearheading the campaign. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:26 am
The first is whether the Act gives authority to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, or instead to U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm by Joseph Koncelik
EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) issued a direct final rule without public comment amending the definition of the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) which governs the scope of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm by Joseph Koncelik
EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) issued a direct final rule without public comment amending the definition of the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) which governs the scope of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 12:15 pm by Tom Webley
In this case, credit the difference, in large part, to two factors: (1) the Senate-passed WRDA bill does not include any earmarking but instead authorizes all “ready-to-go” water development projects, i.e. those with both a completed Report from the Chief of the Army Corps of Engineers and a referral to Congress by the Corps (Section 1002); and (2) the Harbor Maintenance Trust fund, which funds all water projects, has a healthy surplus of almost $7… [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 6:35 pm by Joe Koncelik
Under the Clean Water Act (CWA), you cannot impact a federally protected stream or wetland unless you obtain a 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE).See 33 U.S.C. [read post]