Search for: "U.S. v. Bishop*"
Results 421 - 440
of 466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Failure to Function/Non-distinctiveness:TTAB Finds Religious Habit Not Registrable: Lacks Distinctiveness, Inherent or AcquiredFamous Marks Doctrine:Precedential No. 17: TTAB Dismisses Bayer "FLANAX" Cancellation Claims - No Famous Marks Exception in US LawFraud:Precedential No. 23: TTAB Refuses to Hear Belated Fraud Claim, Finding It Not Tried By ConsentPrecedential No. 21: TTAB Sustains "PALOMA" 2(d) Opposition to "PALOMITA" for Clothing, But Dismisses Claim for… [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:50 pm
United States, 498 U.S. 192, 202 (1991); United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 9:40 am
[The U.S. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:10 am
James has filed a petition for certiorari with the U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 8:46 pm
On April 1st, the U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 12:37 pm
See Doe v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:05 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 11:05 pm
It would have essentially codified Roe v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:12 am
Green, 2009 U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 10:50 pm
The complaint (full text) in ACLU of Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000): "'[T]he indictment must allege whatever is in law essential to the punishment sought to be inflicted.' (quoting 1 J. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 5:56 am
Sanders v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:27 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 24, 2008 Smith v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:50 am
Essentially, it involves increased support for social programs that will help poor women and families, under the reasoning that poor women without means are more likely to abort than women who are financially secure.Since Obama's election means that Roe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:14 am
A panel of the U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:49 am
Harney, 331 U.S. 367, 374 (1947)). [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:37 pm
In Tison v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:00 am
In Ogle v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 21, 2008 U.S. v. [read post]
