Search for: "UNITED STATES CELLULAR"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2017, 11:45 am
CalGINA added “genetic information” as a basis for discrimination to California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), which now states that “[i]t is an unlawful employment practice, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification, or, except where based upon applicable security regulations established by the United States or the State of California … [f]or an employer, because of the … genetic… [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
The majority opinion noted the 2012 Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 10:14 am
“Wireless Telephone Service” means two-way, real time voice telecommunications service that is interconnected to a public switched telephone network and is commonly referred to as cellular service or personal communication service. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:25 pm
United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:32 pm
United States, one of the long-pending cases on whether the Fourth Amendment protects government access to historical cell-site records. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:51 am
United States (16-402). [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
United States, 16-7314, the only case among the group in which the respondent had not yet filed a brief. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:51 am
NLRB, and the Eighth Circuit in Cellular Sales of Missouri v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:32 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am
United States, 16-402 Issue: Whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell-phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell-phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:38 am
In that letter, Apple states the following:"Despite being just one of over a dozen companies that contributed to basic cellular standards, Qualcomm forces the contract manufacturers and Apple to pay many times more in royalty payments than all the other cellular patent licensors combined! [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:57 pm
Knotts and United States v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:34 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:51 pm
Now we fear that ICE may be routinely using CSSs to hunt down people whose only offense is to unlawfully enter or remain in the United States. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, 16-833, which the court denied, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am
United States, 16-402 Issue: Whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell-phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell-phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
