Search for: "UNITED V. PEREZ"
Results 421 - 440
of 752
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2013, 9:03 am
In her concurrence last term in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:58 am
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm
Plaintiff did not adequately preserve the issue on appeal.In Perez v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:55 am
That task was made difficult by a prior decision, Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 2:06 pm
In the 2008 case of Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:45 am
In such cases, the OFCCP will send a letter to the contractor requesting additional data for each non-bargaining unit (i.e. non-un [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 2:10 pm
Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447-48 (Tex. 2011); Nazareth Hall Nursing Ctr. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 2:10 pm
Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447-48 (Tex. 2011); Nazareth Hall Nursing Ctr. v. [read post]
Updated: Amicus briefs in support of the Proposition 8 respondents and DOMA respondent Edith Windsor
1 Mar 2013, 7:37 am
Perry and respondent Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 1:19 pm
Most recently, in 2004, the Supreme Court echoed this point by concluding, in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 11:06 am
Perez, 994 P.2d 874 (Wash. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447-48 (Tex. 2011); Nazareth Hall Nursing Ctr. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447-48 (Tex. 2011); Nazareth Hall Nursing Ctr. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 10:00 pm
It is the federal district court matter of United States v. [read post]
Estrada v. Salas-Perez, 2012 WL 4503147 (N.D.Ill.) [Mexico][Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm]
20 Nov 2012, 8:20 am
In Estrada v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 6:00 am
Sentenced to six months house arrest and a fine of $10,000.United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]
