Search for: "US v. Cruz" Results 421 - 440 of 789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
But many of us with an interest in criminal law are also following Glossip v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:24 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
In 1969, Timothy Leary challenged his arrest for possession of marijuana under the Act; the case of Leary v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
  * Can you use short musical sequences as background loop for a rap song? [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 2:09 pm
 When Guy's attorney drafted the amendment to the trust, he accidentally wrote the thing (using the term "beneficiaries" in an inapposite way) such that under the amendment, Second Wife also now got a fifth of the entire estate. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm by Sandy Levinson
Ted Cruz (also educated at our finest elite schools) memorized the Constitution and won't a word of criticism of it (though I suspect he does not in fact support slavery, as the 1787 Constitution did without using the magic word). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:30 am by azatty
“It’s a portraiture show,” Cruz reminds us, “but not in the mold that you traditionally think. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:27 am
Cruz, the Court has unanimously rejected the Administration’s legal positions twenty times. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:03 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Ante el reclamo de muchos, funcionarios estadounidenses negaron conocer el paradero de los detenidos y prohibieron al Comité Internacional de la Cruz Roja acceso a los centros. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 5:19 pm by Alex Ely
” Not to be outdone, Senator Cruz also focused on the use of drones against American citizens, asking Lynch if she believed that it is “constitutional for the federal government to utilize a drone strike against an American citizen on U.S. soil if that individual does not pose an imminent threat. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
Cruz is a Professor of Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Administrator
For lawyers, understanding verbal fillers provides a lesson in how to approach these pesky utterances, which for most of us have come with a lifetime of stern admonishments to avoid using them at all costs. [read post]