Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 421 - 440
of 51,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2009, 2:08 pm
At least that appears to be the federal government's position given the caption of the case known as United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm
See UnitedStates v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
Bradbury was convicted following trial, but he may appeal given that the case revisits issues raised and left unresolved by US v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:09 am
In Greek v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:03 pm
” SportFuel, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 8:35 am
The Supreme Court never once used the word “software” in its decision. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:21 pm
Today in US v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
Whilst the court decided that no direction on the meaning of substantial was necessary in most cases, it also had to decide what direction should be given in those minority of cases where a direction is given. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
” Their position is that only by allowing universities to use affirmative action will there be enough highly qualified future workers and business leaders, especially given the increasingly global nature of the economy. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:27 am
Those of us who take the Fourth Amendment seriously, with its "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects" from search and seizure, were dismayed by the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Florence v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:50 am
Moreover, given the recent appellate decision in MERS v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 9:10 am
Case citation: Denison v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:24 pm
It can make a huge difference for unpublished works, for example; indeed, it was virtually dispositive in the Harper & Row v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:29 am
They didn’t find anything that would indicate on his person recent meth use. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:46 pm
Last summer, the US Supreme Court court found in Allen v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:53 pm
T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 6:34 pm
The court’s forthcoming decision in Glacier Northwest v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
” That was the moniker given to Oklahoma v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:30 am
Threlfall v Hull City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1147; [2010] WLR (D) 262 “In cases where an employee had been provided with equipment to use in his employment, but injury had occurred and the question arose whether such ‘personal protective equipment’ had been ‘suitable’ for regulatory purposes and issues of negligence, regard was to be given to both regs 4 and 6 of the Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992; and the concept of… [read post]
