Search for: "US v. Hernandez" Results 421 - 440 of 958
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2015, 9:58 pm
Category: Post-Grant Proceedings     By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor  TitleKennametal, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
Category: Administrative Law    By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor  TitleExela Pharama Sciences, LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 2:17 pm
Officer Hernandez was a party to Martzloff v City of New York and his claims in that case were dismissed based on timeliness. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 9:26 pm
Category: Claim Construction    By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor    TitleFenner Inv., Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:02 pm
Category: Claim Construction    By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor   TitlePacing Tech., LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:27 am by Daniel Shaviro
 But if one views this as unconstitutional, it's unconscionable to let states dodge the rule by playing silly semantic games.)It's easy to conclude that ACS v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 6:49 am
Hernandez, who had escaped Cuba for the United States, used a boat in order to pick up family members still in his native country. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 9:54 pm
Category: Civil Procedure    By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor   TitleFleming v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
Category: Claim Construction    By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor   TitleTeva Pharma. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:03 am by David DePaolo
Hernandez.In the Matrix case, Leopoldo Hernandez admitted that he had used a false Social Security number for the purpose of obtaining employment and that this conduct violated Section 440.105(4)(b)(9).However the 1st DCA said Hernandez was entitled to workers' compensation benefits after he got hurt on the job because there was no evidence Hernandez had violated Section 440.105(4)(b)(9) "for the purpose of obtaining workers’ compensation benefits. [read post]