Search for: "US v. Jacobs"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:19 am
By Dennis Crouch The Apple v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:48 am
This post was authored by Patrick Faivre, Touro University, Jacob D. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:15 pm
Ani Creation, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
Nardini Judge Nardini, writing for a unanimous Second Circuit panel (including Judges Jacobs and Raggi), began with the basics. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:48 pm
Wills v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 3:48 pm
” United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
In Jacobs v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:52 am
They also get qualified immunity on the cavity search claim.The case is Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
This is a difficult decision, with Jacob LJ and Mance LJ adopting different interpretations of the law and Sedley LJ apparently agreeing with Jacob LJ but not for the reason given by him. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 8:46 am
The Supreme Court activated the Second Amendment in Heller v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:32 am
In this case, the inmate is represented on appeal by one of the largest law firms in New York City.The case is Shapard v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
The leading case on this issue is McGugan v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:14 pm
He took issue with the terminology used in trade mark law. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:47 am
Jacob J. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:57 am
Court of Federal Claims' (“COFC”) decision in Jacobs Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 9:34 pm
The contracts provided for the BBC to use its endeavours to obtain copyright clearance and for the payment royalties, among other things. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 2:49 am
Rather, a defendant must aim “to permanently deprive the victim[] of the property” (People v Medina, 18 NY3d 98, 105 [2011]; see People v Jennings, 69 NY2d at 118; People v Jacobs, 52 AD3d 432, 433 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 833 [2008]; see also People v Parker, 121 AD3d 1190, 1191 [2014]). [read post]
