Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 421 - 440
of 9,016
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 5:33 pm
Comment This decision follows others where actions have been struck out as a result of limited publication, see Wallis v Meredith ([2011] EWHC 75 (QB)), Bezant v Rausing [2007] EWHC 1118 (QB): McBride v Body Shop Int Plc [2007] EWHC 1658 (QB) and Noorani v Calver [2009] EWHC 561. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
" The district court granted the motion and dismissed the claims. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:40 am
General Telephone Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
Council v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The defence of fair comment was last considered by the House of Lords in Telnikoff v Matusevitch ([1992] 2 AC 343). [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 12:46 am
I won't elaborate on any details today, but I did want to publish a couple of documents and share a few high-level observations. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
” Butler v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:07 am
On January 11, 2016, the Fourth Circuit decided Armstrong v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
The trial court granted summary judgment for XTO, and the Waco Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that Merriman "has alternative uses of his land that are not impracticable or unreasonable. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 3:27 am
The US Supreme Court denied certiorari today in the fantasy baseball case of Major League Baseball Advanced Media v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:02 am
” Today in Horne v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 5:25 pm
The case was Brown v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:29 am
In 1985, the Supreme Court decided that a police officer's use of a level of force that the Court deemed excessive--despite being authorized by state law and consistent with a rule going back to the common law and widely adopted by the states--was an "unreasonable seizure" in violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
The outcome in Trump v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:11 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:52 pm
(emphases in original), it would seem to be specifically directing EPA's attention to the active steps a kiln has taken to 'control' its emissions, not simply to the level of emissions itself. . . [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:52 pm
(emphases in original), it would seem to be specifically directing EPA's attention to the active steps a kiln has taken to 'control' its emissions, not simply to the level of emissions itself. . . [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Circuit’s ruling in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
