Search for: "US v. Powers"
Results 421 - 440
of 37,079
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
Instead of using a formula, the family court considers several factors about each party and their marriage to use its discretion in deciding the amount of alimony. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
Instead of using a formula, the family court considers several factors about each party and their marriage to use its discretion in deciding the amount of alimony. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm
(NA) In Sheetz v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
While States have substantial authority to regulate land use, see Village of Euclid v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 8:42 am
New Article: Colleen V. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:59 am
” Specifically, the court concluded that “State Petitioners point us to no meaningful support for their novel request to apply the equal sovereignty principle as a categorical limit on Congress’s [unquestionably broad] power to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”And yet whether we are talking about ballot access (as both Trump v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm
Before WesternGeco, the Federal Circuit had adopted a strict territorial rule for § 271(a) damages in Power Integrations Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm
This is because the government has the "power to preserve the property under its control for the use to which it is lawfully dedicated. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 8:38 am
The article is here; the Introduction: Over one hundred years ago, in Schenck v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
Mallory v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:57 am
Highlights from the Division of Enforcement included the Staff’s continued use of enforcement sweeps to shape market behavior; how self-reporting and cooperation can positively impact the resolution of matters; an aggressive approach to holding individuals accountable for misconduct and remedies designed to promote strong corporate cultures of compliance; and guidance to practitioners on effective advocacy practices in defending enforcement actions. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
’” And then he added, the bishops “have said they will not use the power of their position, and the great respect it receives from all Catholics, to give an imprimatur to individual politicians or parties. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:13 am
But the Alberta Court of Appeal cleared things up this week, saying the lower court decision “exceed[ed] the limits on the power of the judiciary to change the law. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:06 am
In Lindke v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
The other two cases – Carême v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
" The platforms challenged the law on First Amendment grounds in NetChoice v. [read post]
