Search for: "USA v. Ables" Results 421 - 440 of 1,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2012, 2:26 pm by Karwan Eskerie
In particular, it underlines the importance of the Secretary being able to justify a refusal of permission by reference to the specific facts of each case. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 5:50 am by assoulineberlowe
Kuehne said that because of the firing and fallout from it, Murphy, 60, has not been able to find work in the education field and has suffered poor health, even being hospitalized for three months. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:46 am
Maricopa County is the fourth largest county in the USA, with a population of about 4 million people. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
Essex Trading Standards v Wallati Singh [2009] EWHC 520 (Admin) is a Divisional Court (England and Wales) decision from 3 March which the IPKat nearly missed completely. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 3:31 am
"Oklahoma land rush" for the new media--plaintiffs' bar has used it well.Masback:experience with USA Track & Field--addressing journalists without all facts; pointing fingers is not a good strategyClair:problems for institutions: (1) inability to imagine: a crisis is a low-probability, high-profile event(2) reactions to potential of threat often gets in the way of preparing for crisis(3) inability to deal with potential threats for responseDufresne:need to have sense… [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:10 am by Frank J. Dürring
She cited to the Prussian General Helmuth von Moltke for “devising one of the world’s fist management matrices” when he assessed his officers on two scales: “clever v. dim and lazy v. energetic. [read post]
On 4 December 2020, the English Patents Court handed down its decision in Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Limited & Flynn Pharma Limited v Generics UK Limited (t/a Mylan) & Mylan UK Healthcare Limited, the main action proceedings regarding Neurim’s patent for Circadin, EP 1 441 702 (“EP 702”). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Where goods were first manufactured overseas, however, courts have been virtually unanimous in holding that the first sale doctrine does not apply — I’ve only been able to find one case in the past 30 years that has held otherwise. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Where goods were first manufactured overseas, however, courts have been virtually unanimous in holding that the first sale doctrine does not apply — I’ve only been able to find one case in the past 30 years that has held otherwise. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
In particular, it underlines the importance of the Secretary being able to justify a refusal of permission by reference to the specific facts of each case. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:48 am by Gmlevine
V. and Velcro USA Inc. v. allinhosting.com/Andres Chavez, D2008-0864 (WIPO July 28, 2008) explained that “it would take an exceptional case to succeed where there was no malicious or exploitative intent directed at the complainant [or its trademark] at time of registration of the domain name. [read post]