Search for: "United States' Response Brief Regarding Subject Matter Jurisdiction" Results 421 - 440 of 640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2014, 6:31 am by Steve Vladeck
 § 1805(d)(3) provide that: At or before the end of the period of time for which electronic surveillance is approved by an order or an extension, the judge may assess compliance with the minimization procedures by reviewing the circumstances under which information concerning United States persons was acquired, retained, or disseminated. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am by Steve Vladeck
Consider in that regard the Supreme Court’s Rule 19, which not only provides wholly different procedures for cases in which a question has been certified by a Court of Appeals, but also stresses that “When a question is certified by a United States court of appeals, this Court, on its own motion or that of a party, may consider and decide the entire matter in controversy. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
In the post that follows, I aim to provide a brief overview of KBR v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
However, when Parliament is not in session, the President has the power to issue Ordinances on all subjects over which Parliament has jurisdiction. [read post]
29 May 2014, 12:40 pm by Aaron Barkoff
" Last Friday, May 23, Janssen Biotech filed a motion to dismiss Celltrion’s complaint, alleging that subject matter jurisdiction does not exist under the Declaratory Judgment Act because Celltrion "has not established a real and immediate injury or threat of injury. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 1605(a)(2), a tort claim for personal injuries suffered in connection with travel outside of the United States is “based upon” the allegedly tortious conduct occurring outside of the United States or the preceding sale of the ticket in the United States for the travel entirely outside the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The world of directors and officers liability has long been characterized by rapid change. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
One of the most contentious and complicated emerging issues of corporate law in the United States is the issue of attorney client privilege when it is asserted by an entity. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
This case, at its most elementary level, is about assigning responsibility for the swirl of air pollution that does not respect the boundaries of states, especially in the eastern part of the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:58 am by Ronald Mann
The Fifth Circuit did no better in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In that action, three hospitals affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Health Plan, an HMO, have appealed a ruling by the federal district court for the District of Columbia holding that, although the hospitals did not directly contract with the federal government, they were still subject to OFCCP jurisdiction as federal subcontractors (UPMC Braddock v Harris, March 30, 2013, (96 EPD ¶44,801)). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:23 am by Lauren Bateman
 It says:  “[N]o court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any other action against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the . . . [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 102(g)(2) since the subject matter of the patent had previously been invented. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Circuit panel then dismissed the petitions for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denied the detainees’ petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]