Search for: "United States Army Corps of Engineers" Results 421 - 440 of 908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
  They issued just one opinion in an argued case: United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:05 pm by Molly Runkle
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 11:32 am by Environmental Law Prof
Today, the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in US Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
Army Corps of Engineers finding that property contains “waters of the United States” is “final agency action” subject to judicial review. [read post]
31 May 2016, 8:33 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Tuesday in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:00 am by Andrew Hamm
The Court also released its opinion in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 3:12 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2781970 “The State of New Jersey, the Borough of Harvey Cedars, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers were all preparing for an event like Hurricane Sandy years before the 2012 super-storm made landfall along the Mid-Atlantic coast. [read post]
5 May 2016, 2:13 pm by Blue Blog
(“Butch”) for a renovation project at the Tobyhanna Army Depot in Pennsylvania owned by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
5 May 2016, 2:13 pm by Blue Blog
(“Butch”) for a renovation project at the Tobyhanna Army Depot in Pennsylvania owned by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
5 May 2016, 2:13 pm by Blue Blog
(“Butch”) for a renovation project at the Tobyhanna Army Depot in Pennsylvania owned by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:33 pm by Miriam Seifter
The government faced an uphill battle in Wednesday’s argument in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]