Search for: "United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,383
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2017, 8:21 am
Appeals Court for the Armed Forces (over a dissent): Suppress the evidence. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:15 pm
On August 31, 2017, Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, issued an order invalidating the Obama-era overtime rules. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:15 pm
On August 31, 2017, Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, issued an order invalidating the Obama-era overtime rules. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
Wallace, United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm
As of August 31, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including six Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, three judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and one judge for the United States District Courts. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:19 am
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruling that the “anti-commandeering doctrine” did not apply because PASPA does not require the states to do anything; it simply bars them from allowing sports betting. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 4:49 am
Ross of the Eighth Circuit (1972-1974). [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 11:36 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
On July 19, 2017, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the United States, as the title owner of a former mine, was a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), despite the fact that it did not have a possessory interest in the property at the time of the disposal of hazardous substances. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
On July 19, 2017, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the United States, as the title owner of a former mine, was a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), despite the fact that it did not have a possessory interest in the property at the time of the disposal of hazardous substances. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit agreed, reasoning that “disgorgement was neither a penalty nor a forfeiture. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
The USFWS’ critical habitat designation was upheld by Judge Feldman in the Eastern District of Louisiana in 2014, affirmed by a 2-1 decision in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2016, and denied an en banc rehearing by an 8-6 vote of the Fifth Circuit in February 2017. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
The USFWS’ critical habitat designation was upheld by Judge Feldman in the Eastern District of Louisiana in 2014, affirmed by a 2-1 decision in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2016, and denied an en banc rehearing by an 8-6 vote of the Fifth Circuit in February 2017. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
The USFWS’ critical habitat designation was upheld by Judge Feldman in the Eastern District of Louisiana in 2014, affirmed by a 2-1 decision in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2016, and denied an en banc rehearing by an 8-6 vote of the Fifth Circuit in February 2017. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:17 am
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:57 am
Most notably, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in an en banc decision that a New Jersey statute seeking to legalize sports wagering was preempted by PAPSA and that PAPSA was a constitutionally valid exercise of congressional power. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:57 am
Most notably, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in an en banc decision that a New Jersey statute seeking to legalize sports wagering was preempted by PAPSA and that PAPSA was a constitutionally valid exercise of congressional power. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:16 pm
I was greatly amused to read the comments of The Honorable Paul Michel, former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet at the House of Representatives. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 7:16 am
June 30, 2017), the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held they belong to the employer, who presumably can then either keep them or distribute them in whole or part to employees as it sees fit. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm
The DOL appealed that decision to the Fifth Circuit, but on June 2, the agency filed a motion to hold in abeyance its appeal, noting its intention to commence notice-and-comment rulemaking on a move to rescind the rule and adding that it was seeking expedited review at the OMB. [read post]
