Search for: "United States Court of Federal Claims et al"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
United States of America, et al. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
In the case of Juliana v United States, 21 Americans ranging in age from 11 to 22 filed a claim (Our Children’s Trust) initially in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon in 2015 arguing a fundamental right to live in a world with a stable climate system. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 7:07 pm
The first was delivered by Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Christopher Wray, The Threat Posed by the Chinese Government and the Chinese Communist Party to the Economic and National Security of the United States, Remarks delivered at the Hudson Institute (July 7, 2020). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
Moreover, though the matter is not clear, federal law may often protect private employees who speak out in favor of a federal candidate. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
This paper draws a comparison between COVID claims and asbestos claims, the “Largest and Longest” wave of occupational disease claims in the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:56 am
Alexander, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:56 am
Alexander, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:19 am
In United States Patent And Trademark Office, Et Al., v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:19 am
In United States Patent And Trademark Office, Et Al., v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
On Monday, June 29, Chief Judge Colleen McMahon, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a 37-page opinion which threw out a lawsuit filed by three landlords who alleged that New York State’s moratorium -- on evicting tenants facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the directive permitting tenants to have their landlords apply their security deposits to any outstanding rent -- was… [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
On Monday, June 29, Chief Judge Colleen McMahon, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a 37-page opinion which threw out a lawsuit filed by three landlords who alleged that New York State’s moratorium -- on evicting tenants facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the directive permitting tenants to have their landlords apply their security deposits to any outstanding rent -- was… [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:48 am
PlayAGS, Inc., et al., (Case No. 20-cv-01209) on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired PlayAGS, Inc. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 4:15 am
Jerry Seinfeld et al., United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Case No. 18-cv-01196. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
In a recent NBER report by David Altig et. al., researchers found that by earning an extra $1,000, one in four of the poorest households, regardless of age, gives half to two-thirds of their paycheck to the government in taxes due to marginal net tax rates above 70 percent on earned income.[1] This has significant implications for work incentives and tax credit eligibility if filers combine their incomes and continue working. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
BP PLC et al., further separating climate litigation cases from the federal court system by holding that the nuisance claims in climate litigation shall be heard in state courts and not federal. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 7:10 am
” Given that Trump did the same thing in his presentation of third-party content, he seems to be arguing in the EO that he should not have qualified for Section 230 in 2017. 2) Cockrum et al v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
CALIFORNIA, ET AL. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
BP PLC et al., the district court found that the Plaintiffs’ claims supported federal question jurisdiction because those state-law claims were “necessarily governed by federal common law. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
BP PLC et al., the district court found that the Plaintiffs’ claims supported federal question jurisdiction because those state-law claims were “necessarily governed by federal common law. [read post]
