Search for: "United States v. Ables" Results 421 - 440 of 12,729
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Back in March, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on these cases. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:08 am by Eugene Volokh
[Government officials] are to be treated as "men of fortitude, able to thrive in a hardy climate" …. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 6:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Appellant asserted that she fabricated the allegations in order to be able to remain in the United States after he divorced her. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Surveillance On 12 September 2023, The European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in Wieder and Guarnieri v. the United Kingdom (nos. 64371/16 and 64407/16). [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
As our readers will be able to appreciate, on this occasion we are talking about a monographic publication. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
Persia NavidiReaders of this blog well know that one of the current hot topics in the world of D&O is ESG – and not just in the United States, but in Europe, and elsewhere as well. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Florian Mueller
On Tuesday, "[a]fter carefully considering the briefing and conducting oral argument on August 3, 2023," Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Qualcomm's motion for summary judgment in its entirety: In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation (case no. 17-md-02773-JSC, N.D. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am by Alessandro Cerri
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]