Search for: "United States v. Arnold" Results 421 - 440 of 596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
 Dalsouple Société Saumuroise Du Caoutchouc v Dalsouple Direct Ltd & Another [2014] EWHC 3963 (Ch) is a 1 December ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, in which some of the best legal brains in that jurisdiction had to give some cogent thought to the meaning of the common-or-garden word "consents". [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:04 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: My law firm, Arnold & Porter, is among the counsel to the NAACP in this case.] [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:47 pm by Jim Walker
If you are inclined to voice your concerns to the Court, please write to her at the following address: Re:  United States of America v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
On 10 May 2023, the Court of Appeal (Peter Jackson, Males and Arnold LJJ) heard an appeal in the case of Stoute v News Group Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:21 am by Guest Blogger
If it enshrines in modern jurisprudence doctrines long ago cast aside as outmoded, it will mark not only a turning point in the law, but a judicial mandate for political regression.Rob Weiner, formerly Associate Deputy Attorney General in the United States Department of Justice, is a partner at Arnold & Porter LLP. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
Last Friday, in Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 16 (Ch), in what for him is quite a short judgment, Mr Justice Arnold gave the plot away in the very first of his 77 paragraphs:"In what circumstances can a trader secure a perpetual monopoly in the shape of a product by registering it as a trade mark? [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
United States The Hill reports that President Trump’s reelection campaign is suing CNN for defamation over articles about Russian efforts to assist the Presidents 2016 presidential bid. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]