Search for: "United States v. Breyer"
Results 421 - 440
of 3,537
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2007, 5:16 am
United Haulers v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:36 pm
Two earlier posts had discussed the issue and the oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court in Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
United States, No. 10-7387. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
” Dissent in Trump v Hawaii Justices Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:39 am
I've added a statement on the case from The Owners' Rights Initiative, about the Supreme Court ruling that even books purchased outside the United States are subject to the 'First Sale Doctrine' as long as they are legally purchased (piracy is still a no-no), and brought into the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 9:02 am
Breyer of the United States Supreme Court said that listening to public opinion is “a road to perdition” for judges. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:01 am
Breyer delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm
Army Corps v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
” United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:31 am
Friend, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously agreed that a corporations “principal place of business,” for purposes of determining whether federal courts have diversity jurisdiction (that is, all parties on one side of the versus (“v”) sign are from states different from all parties on the opposite side) to hear a case. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:20 am
United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:03 pm
United States The majority holds that foreign nationals held at Guantanamo Bay have a right to pursue habeas challenges to their detention. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
It's one thing to say, as the Court mistakenly said in Alden v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
Today's fifth and final opinion issued in Chamber of Commerce of United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
United States (No. 09-6822) requires the Court to further sort through the implications and consequences of its landmark ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:12 pm
United States (07-330), on whether a federal court of appeals may increase a criminal defendant's sentence in the absence of a cross-appeal by the government. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm
A state court can say, "We find that procedure X violates provision Y of the United States Constitution. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
