Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 421 - 440 of 9,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2008, 3:02 am
United States Bureau of Prisons, (8th Cir., Feb. 4, 2008), the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a Muslim inmate's free exercise, RFRA and RLUIPA claims. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:20 pm
United States v Groos, June 13, 2008.Defendant Groos requested authorization to depose two "foreign witnesses who will help prove that Mr. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:33 pm by Madelaine Lane
The POUM Clause provides that the legislature may not mandate a new activity or increased level of activity of any unit of local government (such as a school district) unless the State pays the unit of local government for any associated increased costs. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:52 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas declined to certify a class under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:13 pm by Joel R. Brandes
He emphasized that Petitioner voluntarily brought EZL to the United States and executed legal documents allowing the child to stay in the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:51 pm by Joel R. Brandes
’s habitual residence to the United States, regardless of his ability to enter the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 10:51 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
On January 5, 2011, the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana issued a Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order in the case of Big R Towing v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:21 am by Kalvis Golde
The Constitution constrains states from excessively burdening out-of-state commerce – a doctrine known as the dormant commerce clause, because it is implicit in the grant of power to Congress to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
On that same date, the United States Supreme Court issued the landmark Windsor v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Petitioner filed this action against Respondent and alleged that Respondent wrongfully retained the children in the United States without Petitioner's consent starting on January 7, 2013. [read post]
With this established, the district court remarked that the burden was on the defendant to show the home state exception. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Castillo v Ochoa, 2012 WL 523696 (D.Nev.) petitioner, Jose Manuel Garza-Castillo sought the return of his child from the United States to Mexico, pursuant to the Convention. [read post]
14 May 2022, 9:31 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  The plaintiff-employee may attempt to prove discrimination through circumstantial evidence by satisfying the United States Supreme Court’s burden-shifting framework set forth it its decision in McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]