Search for: "United States v. Christian" Results 421 - 440 of 1,901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2010, 5:43 pm by Sheppard Mullin
District Court for the Southern District of Florida granted Revolution’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of United States Patent RE 37,545 (‘545 patent) in Aspex Eyewear, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:41 am by Kiera Flynn
United States, Smith v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The “separation” of church and state was an epithet antithetical to their agenda of retaking the United States as a “Christian country,” even though it was never mono-religious. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Finchett-Maddock & Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, To Open Up: A performative rewriting of Pendragon v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR CD 179 , (Helen Dancer, Bonnie Holligan and Helena Howe (eds.) [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:14 am by Amanda Rice
United States (the “honest services” case) “has led to a string of dropped charges and new trials. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:43 pm
Bernal, Judge of the United States District Court, Central District of California.Historical and personal perspectives will be presented by Ms. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:27 pm by Mack Sperling
National Council of the Young Men's Christian Assocation of the United States of America, a purported class action by YMCA members. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 6:23 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Today marks the 75th anniversary of the Supreme Court's opinion in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 4:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
This principle most often arises in church property disputes, where the Supreme Court has held that courts may not decide which faction in a church is the more religiously orthodox, but it also applies more broadly to prohibit the government from adjudicating people’s rights based on theological judgments (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 2:43 pm
" The Court of Appeals found that Detective Schrott's statement undermined the Miranda warning, the well-known statement of a criminal defendant's rights deriving from the United States Supreme Court case, Miranda v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 4:53 pm by Patricia Salkin
… the court, in its discretion, mayallow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney’s fee…. [read post]