Search for: "United States v. Common" Results 421 - 440 of 15,335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 2:48 pm by The Complex Litigator
On the consumer litigation front, today the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Ticketmaster, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:09 pm by Michael DelSignore
United States, the defense argues that at the time of the court decision in it was very rare to have both federal and state prosecutions, but with the expansion of federal law, dual prosecutions have become more common. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:09 pm by Michael DelSignore
United States, the defense argues that at the time of the court decision in it was very rare to have both federal and state prosecutions, but with the expansion of federal law, dual prosecutions have become more common. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by JB
I have posted my latest piece, Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:43 am
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:50 pm
For the PDF of the full United States Supreme Court opinion delivered by Justice Sotomayor with the full concurrence of all justices, you can read the original PDF opinion in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 6:44 am by Joel R. Brandes
” In applying Portugal’s choice of law provision to this case, the “common national law of the parents” is the United States, because both Aluker and Yan are United States citizens. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 6:44 am by Joel R. Brandes
” In applying Portugal’s choice of law provision to this case, the “common national law of the parents” is the United States, because both Aluker and Yan are United States citizens. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 6:52 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, No. 13-15213 (9th Cir. 2015), August 4, 2015, United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit More Blog Entries: SSDI Approvals Lowest in Five Years, June 20, 2014, Boston Social Security Disability Lawyers Blog The post Brown-Hunter v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court vacated that decision and ordered the Ninth Circuit to reconsider it in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]