Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 421 - 440
of 768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2012, 10:29 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, Kloeckner v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:27 am
” She added that “while defendants’ contention that an investor could not purchase an RDS in the United States without a corresponding overseas transaction may be true, it does not change the fact that a purchase in the United State still took place. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm
Lawfare readers will recall that in March the Supreme Court ordered the case of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum to be re-briefed and reargued to address the additional question of whether the Alien Tort Statute applies to violations of international law occurring in the sovereign territory of other countries. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:27 am
At the Huffington Post, Scottie Thomaston has coverage of an amicus brief filed recently by Indiana and fourteen other states in Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., in which the U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:33 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, which we last covered here. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:33 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, which we last covered here. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:25 am
ProPublica explores states’ varied responses to the Court’s consolidated opinion in Miller v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The United States and Ecuador are both members of the Organization of American States and parties to the Inter-American Convention, so that a majority of the parties are citizens of a State or States that have ratified or acceded to the Inter-American Convention and are member States of the Organization of American States, and thus that Convention rather than the New York Convention appears to apply” (citations and internal… [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm
The great object [of the statute]… was to protect the merchant vessels of the United States and their crews from piratical aggressions. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:11 am
Before responding to particular participants, I should introduce an important intervening precedent – United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:53 am
And contrary to some commentators, the 1790 criminal piracy statute at issue in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:20 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:00 am
The government objects to the defendants' efforts to scuttle the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
District Court for the District of Columbia referenced my most-noted formulation of this principle in a foreign-cubed piracy case, United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:49 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum comes from Oona A. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 am
Indeed, that issue could not have been presented in Sosa, which involved conduct for which the United States could easily have been deemed responsible. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:28 am
The Court’s 2010 opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:08 am
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
