Search for: "United States v. Englander" Results 421 - 440 of 2,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm
Thus, when he returned from England, he was a free man because British friends had purchased his liberty. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:58 am by Susan Brenner
In or about August 2010, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, in coordination with DOJ, issued a subpoena to BP for flow-rate related documents from April 20, 2010 to August 9, 2010. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
  Indeed, particularly in recent decades, the law of defamation has evolved to provide more adequate protection for freedom of expression on matters of public interest”. [19] She discerned a general trend towards revising the law of defamation to provide more protection for freedom of expression which could be observed in England, Australia, New Zealand, United States, Germany and the European Court of Human Rights: “What is of interest for my purposes is… [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:01 am
One seat is vacant.These Justices will serve as the final domestic forum for litigants in England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, hearing cases that may last for days, quite different from the 1-hour arguments typical in the United States.In a twist, the lawyers wear robes, and wigs, but the Justices prefer plainclothes.The court's 1st argument entailed a fascinating interplay of internal and international law.Captioned Her Majesty's Treasury (Respondents)… [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
  In general, common law jurisdictions such as England & Wales, the United States of America, Canada and Australia have substantially greater guidance available, reflecting a well-developed practice of using surveys as evidence. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:48 am by Toam Rubinstein and Stacy K. Marcus
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted the photographer’s motion to dismiss, including for failure to state a claim. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:48 am by Toam Rubinstein and Stacy K. Marcus
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted the photographer’s motion to dismiss, including for failure to state a claim. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 10:24 pm
Important differences in both the doctrinal definition of protected speech and the mechanism of protection employed in England and the United States are recognized and evaluated. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
 In the Atlantic, Mary Ziegler (Florida State University), "The Justices Are Telling Us What They Think About Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:11 pm by Howard Friedman
Summary dismissal of a suit charging discrimination based on sex and religion for failure to state a claim.Village of Bensenville v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
   Bin Mafouz sued in England for libel and Ms Ehrenfeld refused to appear. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 3:51 pm by Scott C. Idleman
Such an arrangement is not found elsewhere within the United States—whether one considers the federal government, the states, or even counties and municipalities—nor is it readily found elsewhere outside of the United States, except perhaps in extreme situations such as post-war occupation or the international refusal to recognize a geopolitical group’s sovereignty in the first instance. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:50 pm
Baumbast v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Case C-413/99, [2002] ECR I-07091 was raised. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 12:31 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
With its extra margin, Irish law prevailed.Greenhouse notes that the European Court accepted a situation similar to what would come into being if the United States Supreme Court withdrew the constitutional right to abortion and the matter were left to state law. [read post]