Search for: "United States v. Gladding"
Results 421 - 436
of 436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2007, 5:30 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 11:29 am
Douglas Carlson submits a FOIA request that wants to know the addresses and hours and final collection times for all of the post offices in the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 9:47 pm
The TDRA establishes that “[a] famous mark is one that ‘is widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:02 pm
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case, Baze v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 12:20 am
Schweitzer and United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 2:47 pm
I didn't buy it, but I was glad to see that the French seem to be waking up to the possibility of exploiting their copyrights in the U.S. market in an attractively-packaged, competitively-priced way.The United States has historically viewed French copyrights with suspicion. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 6:38 am
Harding, Earley, Follmer & Frailey is one lawsuit that I was glad to see dismissed on summary judgment by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:49 pm
In the case of U.S. v Wilson (32 US 150) the Supreme Court stated that a pardon is like a gift that can be refused, upholding the notion in Burdick v U.S. (236 US 79). [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 7:09 pm
I’m glad I discovered it. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 5:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
(Rivera v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
It posits the question "What if instead of ‘Bong Hits 4 Jesus,' the banner had said ‘Bong Stinks 4 Jesus,'" reporting on the oral arguments in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 7:17 am
From Bill Ross: Paternity cases are an everyday occurence throughout the United States, so what makes this story so unique? [read post]
11 Aug 2006, 8:02 pm
Then there's article IV, section 4: "The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union, a republican form of government". [read post]
