Search for: "United States v. Haire" Results 421 - 440 of 750
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2013, 10:17 am by National Indian Law Library
Thompson (prisoners, hair length)* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmCases featured:Board of Commissioners of Cherokee County, Kansas, v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:48 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On 28 April 1988, the United States Senate unanimously approved mandatory AIDS testing of people convicted of sex crimes and drug crimes. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm by Jim Gerl
Some states of the United States have implemented laws to address school bullying. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:24 am by Kathy Kapusta
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court stated that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-8505, for that upstart non-relist Paroline v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Observing that her claim must rise, if at all, under the ADA, the court pointed out that the EEOC has stated, “The definition of the term ‘impairment’ does not include physical characteristics such as eye color, hair color, left-handedness, or height, weight, or muscle tone that are within ‘normal’ range. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff was also granted leave to file an amended complaint setting out a RLUIPA claim.In United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: UNSR Letter of Allegation Indigenous Prisoners Religious Freedom Excerpt: A pattern of restricting American indigenous prisoners’ religious freedoms is currently occurring throughout the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
Particular account had to be taken of the Contracting State’s broad margins of appreciation for both commercial speech and the protection of rights of others. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
The knighthood slipping tantalisingly further away, as his wife ruffled what is left of his hair and assuring him that his cabinet post is the 21st century equivalent of the 1970s secretary of state for Northern Ireland in the popularity/career building stakes. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
United States, No. 11-820 (Feb. 20, 2013).We've blogged about what I still believe to be the landmark decision of Padilla v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm by Richard Goldfarb
  The Washington Supreme Court's decision in Bylsma v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:42 pm by Justin K. Beyer
On January 22, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Steven Shreder of the Eastern District of Oklahoma issued a report and recommendation, following Plaintiff Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:10 am by Kevin
Probably the best-known case on this is Leonard v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
  Ultimately, however, the United States Department of Justice indicted MacDonald, and a jury convicted him after a trial in 1979. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:54 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
    The lifting of the ban places the United States with roughly a dozen other countries that allow women to serve as part of combat units, including Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, and Norway. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am by Russell Beck
” Virginia: As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently made clear in JTH Tax, Inc. v. [read post]