Search for: "United States v. Holmes" Results 421 - 440 of 770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm by Tom Crane
United States, in which Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said that falsely yelling fire in a crowded tehater was not protected speech. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:10 pm by Brian Tamanaha
The United States legal culture has swallowed whole a largely false account of our legal history. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”) Florence Kelley didn’t think you had to squint to notice the enduringly unequal status of women in the United States in 1923. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:57 pm by DougW
John Larimer, United States Navy cryptologist. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  My supportive example from the current Supreme Court is United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Will Baude
It might even enable — and ultimately did enable — the election of a constitutionally ineligible President who had engaged in insurrection against the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Commerce Clause, in Nation and States,” at the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:55 am by Danielle Citron
And Congress is different, which is why Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in 1913: “I do not think the United States would come to an end if we lost our power to declare an Act of Congress void. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:08 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] It may just be me, but heretofore the Fifth Circuit was not known to be particularly amusing. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
There is an established right under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution which prohibits the execution of one who is insane, as set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Ford v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
There is an established right under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution which prohibits the execution of one who is insane, as set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Ford v. [read post]