Search for: "United States v. Interstate General Co."
Results 421 - 440
of 458
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 4:38 am
(g) there is any other basis consistent with the constitutions of this State and the United States for the exercise of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
American Press Co., supra; Pierce v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 11:44 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
In Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:39 am
In Gilmer v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 10:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:36 am
In particular, the court focused on a distinction that it had drawn in an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
July 21, 1998); United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
Take a look:[T]he FD&C Act and FDA's implementing regulations generally prohibit manufacturers of new drugs or medical devices from distributing products in interstate commerce for any intended use that FDA has not approved as safe and effective or cleared through a substantial equivalence determination. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:51 am
United States: hard cases make bad law. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
Johnnie's Poultry Co., 344 F.2d 617 (8th Cir. 1965), violation. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
See, e.g., Hopson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Riggi, No. 061280 Conviction on charges arising out of involvement in an organized crime family, including racketeering, murder and related conspiracies, is vacated and remanded where admission of eight plea allocutions of non-testifying co-conspirators amounted to plain error under the intervening authority of Crawford v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Santillana, No. 06-1276 A sentence for using a firearm during, and in relation to, a drug trafficking offense is affirmed where: 1) defendant was not challenging the reasonableness of the sentence; and 2) the circuit court generally does not review a district court's decision not to depart downward, and no exception to that rule applied here. .. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
