Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 421 - 440
of 9,146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2021, 4:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:45 pm
From the Journal of Accountancy: The United States Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a Tax Court decision and upheld a Treasury regulation that sets a two-year statute of limitation on claims for innocent spouse relief (Jones v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 6:17 pm
Discrimination/Retaliation*Bryant v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm
The Library of Congress has posted its Constitution Day event, a September 14, 2022, conversation between Mark V. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:22 am
Supreme Court significantly narrowed the definition of “waters of the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Morgan Lewis partner Mark Krotoski and associate Jonathan Justl authored a Law360 article about the oral arguments recently heard by the US Supreme Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:28 pm
United States, No. 08-67, at this link. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm
First, with regard to acquiescence, section 48 of the Trade Marks Act of 1994 states the following: “(1) Where the proprietor of an earlier trade mark or other earlier right has acquiesced for a continuous period of five years in the use of a registered trade mark in the United Kingdom, being aware of that use, there shall cease to be any entitlement on the basis of that earlier trade mark or other right— to apply for… [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
At the same time though, there will be a new “high-water mark” of criminal enforcement. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:28 am
An amendment should specifically overturn Kohl v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:57 pm
Buccellati v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:42 am
United States … to the splintered opinion in Freeman v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
Long-standing precedent makes clear that Trademark Act Section 2(d) provides two separate bases for refusal, one being a mark registered in the USPTO and the other being a mark (or trade name) previously used in the United States and not abandoned, and that the requirement of priority of use applies only to unregistered marks asserted as a bar to registration. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 2:43 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had to determine if JobDiva Inc. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 2:43 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had to determine if JobDiva Inc. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:03 am
Belmora's FLANAXBased on its reading of the Supreme Court’s Lexmark decision, the lower court had dismissed Bayer’s Section 43(a) false association and false advertising claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) and entered judgment on the pleadings as to Bayer’s Section 14(3) claim, ruling that the Lanham Act does not allow an owner of a foreign mark not registered in the United States, who does not use the mark in the United States… [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
Currently, any individual may bring a claim on behalf of the United States for false patent marking. [read post]
