Search for: "United States v. Newman" Results 421 - 440 of 582
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 5:37 am
v Bettenhauser, 95 NY2d 185, 188; see State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:00 am by James Yang
  The three independent claims in the United States allows the patent drafter to draft one independent claim directed to one of a plurality of implementations. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Newman Issue: Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in granting habeas relief and applying the "reasonable speculation" rule, when the Michigan state court had applied the Jackson v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Young Moon, appeals from her conviction and sentence entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on April 25, 2006, for three counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
In a case of “turnabout is fair play,” last Friday, a United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut considered, and disregarded, the USPTO’s reexamination analysis of the same prior art in Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Someone raised a First Amendment objection to the morphing prohibition, but the Second Circuit will have none of this.The case is United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
However, the court also stressed that Phillips’ refusal to serve Charlie Craig and David Mullins occurred before the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:11 pm
For example, if the applicant abandons an application more that one year after the first public use or sale in the United States or the first publication of the invention, all rights to the invention in the United States are effectively abandoned because the application cannot be refiled. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am by Alan Neff
Juntilla and Newman reportedly have been dismissed from the proceeding, presumably because sanctions imposed on them by the District Court in King v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
– 5:05 P.M.SESSION V (with coffee break 3:30-3:50)NYS CLE Credit: 2.0, Areas of Professional PracticeCommentators on proposals presented, and Q&A PeriodJane Ginsburg, ModeratorMorton L. [read post]