Search for: "United States v. Olds" Results 421 - 440 of 8,846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
The Supreme Court of the United States on Wednesday heard oral arguments in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:10 pm
 State law says that you can't raise the rent to market rates until the original "the original occupant or occupants who took possession of the the dwelling or unit . . . no longer permanently reside there. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, we celebrate the wonder of human existence and renew our resolve to build a culture of life where every person of every age is protected, valued, and cherished.This month, we mark nearly 50 years since the United States Supreme Court’s Roe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 3:30 pm
I'm fairly confident that Judge Kleinfeld gets this one right, and that Jose Valeriano -- a 34-year old Mexican national with three United States citizen children -- isn't entitled to equitable tolling, and hence can and will (and, legally, should) be deported to Mexico. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:24 pm by Kalvis Golde
United States 22-163Issues: (1) Whether the limits on agency deference announced in Kisor v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:28 am
The statute would repeal the thirty-one year old Marquette decision, which was the United States Supreme Court ruling that held federal law preempted state law regulating interest rates. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:55 am by Scott Bomboy
But in 1990, the Court struck down that law as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:20 pm by Joel R. Brandes
  [Canada][Habitual residence] [Petition denied]      In Watson v Watson 2023 WL 1967587 (M.D. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
This is not a bankruptcy case, but it will be applicable in many large bankruptcy cases involving allegations of fraud by shareholders or investors.On January 15, 2008, the United States Supreme Court entered an important decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]