Search for: "United States v. Power Engineering Co." Results 421 - 440 of 482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 2:07 pm by Matt Sundquist
At Concurring Opinions, Anita Krishnakumar writes about the Court's recent opinion in Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
The court threw new obstacles Friday in front of the Sevier Power Co. by requiring a substantial updating of its air-pollution permit for a 270-megawatt, $600 million electric generator in Sigurd. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Van Hook (09-144) United States Defense Department v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am by Fred Goldsmith
Sept. 11, 2009), the plaintiff seaman was allowed, in the wake of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Atlantic Sounding Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 9:25 am by P.K. Runkles-Pearson
Finally, on a date to be announced, the Court will hear Granite Rock Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
Safford United School District #1 v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:49 am
The most important implication of FERA is that it overturns the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Allison Engine Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
: Federal Administrative Court rulings in CALVI and TRELLEBORG cases (International Law Office) Motion marks: Swiss IPO allows Swisscom to file MPG-file of motion mark in motion (Class 46)   United Kingdom Class dispute over similarity of goods too complex for summary judgment: Daimler AG v Sany Group Co Ltd (Class 46) The war on counterfeits: how much would you spend? [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]