Search for: "United States v. Texas" Results 421 - 440 of 8,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2009, 3:22 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of TexasOpinion Date: 5/11/09Cite: Courtoom Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 2:07 pm
[www.josemedellin.info]No. 08-_____===============================================================IN THESupreme Court of the United States--------------------------------- . [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 2:55 pm by Adam Lamparello
Like a bad dream (or a toxic ex-partner), abortion has made yet another unwelcome visit to the United States Supreme Court, thanks to the State of Texas. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 2:14 pm by Paulo McKeeby and Andrew Workman
On November 15, 2024, a United States Eastern District Court in Texas struck down a 2024 Department of Labor (DOL) rule that would have made four million previously exempt workers eligible for overtime by 2025. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:59 am
On Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court will hear argument in Medellin v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:41 pm by Alison Rowe
 The laws surrounding horse slaughter in the United States are complicated, and they vary from state to state. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 4:43 am by Immigration Prof
At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein and Pratheepan Gulasekaram explain how states might challenge executive nonenforcement policies in the posture of defendants—what they call “ex post judicial review”—and suggest what this alternative route could entail for questions of standing, separation... [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:00 am by Robert Epstein
The Supreme Court based its reasoning largely around the Supreme Court of the United States opinion rendered in Troxel v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Wasserman The Supreme Court hears arguments Monday in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 11:42 am by Kate Fort
It’s about 8 pages longer than the previous complaint, and adds the Department of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of the Department, and the United States as defendants. [read post]