Search for: "United States v. Treasury Employees"
Results 421 - 440
of 461
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
Bank v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:00 pm
United States of America ex rel. [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:38 am
§ 713 (United States, President, Vice President, Senate, House of Representatives and Congress); 18 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
Supreme Court rejected this kind of "end run" in the IPO Laddering Antitrust Case (Credit Suisse v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
” [17] The enforcement unit of the Fina [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:27 pm
Hirsh, Marco V. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
It states that Congress found the following: (i) the Treasury Secretary does not have authority to provide exemptions or special rules to particular industries or classes of taxpayers; (ii) the Notice granting 382 relief is inconsistent with Congressional intent and the legal authority of this Notice is doubtful; but (iii) taxpayers should be allowed to rely on the Notice. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
The top officials at Treasury have already set aside all of the broad governmental powers available (claiming we are a "nation of laws"), so let's look at the United States purely as an angel investor which saw a large company faltering and swooped in with an 80% equity investment. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 11:21 am
A huge portion of the Big Three’s expenses are benefits paid out to employees, former employees, and retirees. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 8:38 pm
Foreign Service Officer and State Department employee David C. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:42 am
Railway Labor Executives' Association, National Treasury Employees Union v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
Relationship to United States Citizens3. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:37 pm
USA", Case No. 07-3686, decided October 29, 2008 by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals) against the United States to recover taxes it paid in 1995 and 1996 under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act ("FICA"), § § 3101-3128, on behalf of its medical residents. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:00 pm
The Act disclaims the entities' status as an agency or establishment of the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:41 am
"); United States v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:32 am
North Dakota case, holding that a state could not impose sales tax collection obligations on a company, unless the company has either property or employees in the state. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:32 am
North Dakota case, holding that a state could not impose sales tax collection obligations on a company, unless the company has either property or employees in the state. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
F-1 students generally are not authorized to work in the United States during the term of their educational program, with limited exceptions. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:31 pm
The bill would also "correct" the decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
