Search for: "Unknown Persons and Interested Parties" Results 421 - 440 of 1,794
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2020, 7:51 am by Kathleen
If the responsible party attempts to speak with you at the accident scene, do not respond. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 1:41 pm by Richard J. Harknett
And even if a state could achieve that, the single person would exfiltrate just so much information (even the best-placed human spies of the 20th century, such as Britain’s infamous Cambridge Five, could hardly match what cyber exploitation now makes possible). [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm by Adam C. Ragan
They filled up answering machine tapes, preventing consumers from receiving important and personal messages they actually wanted. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eve Gaumond
But that claim raises an interesting question: Are the United States’s sister democracies doing any better than the United States in countering disinformation? [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
First, it rejected the argument that it was justifiable because of the lower protection given to some attorney speech and professional speech: The Court recognizes that Pennsylvania has an interest in licensing attorneys and the administration of justice. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Last Week  in the Courts On 30 November 2020 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of HJK v Persons Unknown. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 8:07 am by Joanna Herzik
The text said to call the bank immediately and that an unknown subject opened an account with their information and misappropriated money. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
He thanked solicitors and counsel and said that he had had a “very interesting ride” and was “faintly sorry” to leave it behind. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:49 pm by Mark Hartsoe
According to both the plaintiff and a witness to the accident, an unknown driver caused the crash and then left the scene. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 12:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
[Confidential treatment is allowed only if a party] can demonstrate that "the public interest in access to Court proceedings is outweighed by the harm that public disclosure of sensitive, non-public information would cause. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 11:36 am by Heather Douglas
Considering the level of uncertainty about the availability of civil jury trials in Ottawa and adjournment to an unknown future date would not serve the interests of justice or the interests of the parties If civil jury trials become available before the judge alone trial commences, the parties could appear before Justice Rogers to determine whether the interests of justice then balanced differently. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 10:59 am by Eugene Volokh
The court upheld the conviction, and rejected Marino's free speech argument: The state has broad power to limit a person's liberty interests based on that person's prior conduct. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am by Josh Blackman
Counsel, I've always thought that a compelling state interest that motivated our holdings in racial discrimination cases was not merely that race was important but that the burden on the people who are rejected because of race is an interest that the state could seek to protect, that a rejection on the basis of race or any protected category creates a stigma on that person and that it's a compelling state interest for the state to have an… [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Daniel Jin
Conclusions A number of interesting points arise from this Penalty Notice. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 10:13 am by Eugene Volokh
 Conduct may … create risk by exposing another to the improper conduct of third parties. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Kelsey Landau
If this ownership information is unknown, such conflicts of interest will never be scrutinized; however, if it is published in a beneficial ownership registry, citizens and civil society organizations can examine the politicians’ behavior to make sure they are working on behalf of the country and not themselves. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
            Just how she will vote on the various cases and controversies that will find their way to the Court is unknown. [read post]