Search for: "Want v. Arkansas, State of" Results 421 - 440 of 479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Michael Ehline
The British government wanted to seize the lawfully owned firearms of the colonists. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
  Consider, for example, the temporary takings case on the Court’s docket, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:14 am by Kathy Kapusta
While the university argued that the Tenth Circuit, in Etsitty v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 11:24 am
Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97, 103-04 (1968), the United States Supreme Court notes: Government in our democracy, state and national, must be neutral in matters of religious theory, doctrine, and practice. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:52 am by Bexis
”  Eberhart, slip op. at 9; see also id. at 9 (“she did not want a root canal or to even talk with [the specialist] about it, so she wanted [the tooth] removed”). [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
  Before that, we noted some better—from our perspective—decisions from the same court involving  smacking around a plaintiff lawyer for discovery nonsense, referring a state law question to the Arkansas Supreme Court, and even knocking out speculative medical monitoring opinions under Daubert. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am by Jeffrey Sonnenfeld
” Accordingly, some people may want to vote for a 28-year-old candidate as in 1968 when activists at the Democratic National Convention tried to nominate underage Julian Bond for vice president. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)Affirming JV ($10K wages; $20K comps; $220K atty fees) for fired rental car company station manager on her sex harass-based retaliation/discharge state law claims; but reducing punitive damages award from $500K to $120K)Commentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions> 3rd Cir.o o No need to accommodate shorter commuteParker v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:09 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee sued the employer, the alleged harasser, the supervisor, and the VP, alleging sexual harassment under Title VII and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act. [read post]