Search for: "Warner Brothers" Results 421 - 440 of 744
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 7:49 am by Scott Shaffer
Warner Brothers also noted that Whitmill did not protect his rights when Tyson appeared in the first Hangover movie, as well as a Tyson documentary and the movie Rocky Balboa. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:41 pm by Eric
The balancing of the moneys that Warner Brothers would lose versus the irreparable harm suffered by Whitmill over the loss of control of his work weighed slightly in favor of Warner Brothers. [read post]
22 May 2011, 7:41 am by Gerard Magliocca
 Warner Brothers is claiming, among other things, that the depiction of the tattoo is fair use because it is a parody of the original. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:57 am by Media Law Prof
From the Hollywood Reporter: Judge Allan Goodman has requested additional briefing on some issues before issuing his ruling on the question of whether Charlie Sheen will be getting that jury trial on his lawsuit against Warner Brothers and CBS. [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:43 am by Brian Baxter
Former sibling Warner Brothers Entertainment is buying Flixster, owner of the site Rotten Tomatoes, with a hand from Fenwick & West and O'Melveny & Myers. [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:36 pm
The complaint argues that Whitmill has never reproduced, authorized or licenced the design to anyone else, making Warner Brothers use of the design even more "reckless". [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:46 pm
In a move that reads like the script of a movie itself, Mike Tyson's tattoo artist is suing Warner Brother's Entertainment to halt the release of "The Hangover 2. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:21 pm by jlutz99
Mike Tyson's tattoo artist has sued Warner Brothers over the use of a copyrighted tattoo. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:05 pm by Jonathan Bailey
Victor Whitmill, the tattoo artist who drew the famous face tattoo on Mike Tyson, is suing Warner Brothers after a similar tattoo appeared on the face of Ed Helms’ character in the upcoming movie “The Hangover 2?. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by Jonathan Bailey
Dropbox has admitted a DMCA notice it sent was a “mistake”, caused by a bug in Dropbox’s file removal system, but has continued to try and shut down all mirrors of the software.3: YouTube Is Said to Be Near a Major Film Rental DealNext up today, reports from industry insiders indicate that Sony, Warner Brothers and Universal have all inked deals with Google to rent movies via YouTube, a project that has been in the works for at least two years. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:04 am by Lawrence Cunningham
It’s wonderful when real world events dovetail with classroom lessons and nowhere is that more evident today than with Charlie Sheen versus Warner Brothers in Contracts classes. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:46 pm by Media Law Prof
From The Hollywood Reporter: Warner Brothers and Alan Ladd, Jr., have settled their dispute over the profits Mr. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm by lpbncontracts
Charlie Sheen--entangled in a contractual dispute with his employer, Warner Brothers--first claimed that his contract had no morals... [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
The AmeriKat was travelling again this past week. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:03 am by Media Law Prof
The Hollywood Reporter reports that Charlie Sheen's attorney Marty Singer contests Warner Brothers' version of events concerning discussions over Mr. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:34 pm by Media Law Prof
From The Hollywood Reporter: Warner Brothers lawyers Munger Tolles & Olsen have informed Charlie Sheen's attorney Marty Singer, "As you know, there have been no discussions, there are no discussions, and there will be no discussions, regarding his [Charlie Sheen's]... [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:23 am by Jonathan Bailey
Warner Brothers wanted to force the plaintiffs to turn over alleged agreements they had made, which Warner claims to be in violation of copyright, but the court ruled that they were not discoverable as they were protected by attorney-client privilege. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:58 pm by Lara
  Sheen’s response, of course, was to file suit against Warner Brothers. [read post]