Search for: "Washington v. State of Indiana"
Results 421 - 440
of 785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
For other Texas (and other states’) cases applying the learned intermediary rule to prescription medical devices, see our post here.Collectively, strike one.Second, Texas’ rejection of design defect claims involving prescription medical products is also reflected in that state’s product liability statute. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 6:33 am
Perhaps we can gain some insights on this issue from yesterday's Washington state Supreme Court decision in Rousso v. [read post]
4 Dec 2001, 4:00 pm
Co. of Indiana. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Among these states, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin expressly allow recovery of filial consortium damages pursuant to statute. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:03 am
King v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:10 pm
The plaintiffs in Applewhite v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:57 am
United States, 470 U.S. 598, 607–08 (1985) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
In an opinion piece published on 30 March 2019 in The Washington Post, Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg called for more regulation of the internet. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 12:10 pm
One Year After The Hearing In Pliva v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:01 pm
Indiana (docket 09-866). [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
Washington, that prejudice requires a showing that, but for counsel’s error, there is a reasonable probability of a different outcome.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (6th Cir.)Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionReply of petitioner Parker v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:36 am
Updating this Jan. 4, 2007 ILB entry, which began "A law suit similar to that filed in Indiana and several other states has now been filed in Wisconsin," the Pioneer Press reports today:Wisconsin rules that prohibit judicial candidates from making comments that seem like promises to rule in specific ways will remain in place during a key race for the state Supreme Court, a federal judge ruled Tuesday. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:37 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:26 am
In Lorenzo v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 1:59 am
In the quiet between Christmas and New Years, the FDA released an environmental assessment conducted in response to a multi-state foodborne disease outbreak involving 33 cases of E. coli O145 infections in five states in the spring of 2010. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
United States, urging the Court to strike Arizona’s controversial immigration law. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am
Indiana, 17-1511Issues: (1) Whether Miller v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
I was expecting the worst when I saw the caption Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
