Search for: "Waters v. Superior Court" Results 421 - 440 of 891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2011, 5:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In 1983, the California Supreme Court decided National Audubon Society v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 1:01 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
In such cases the owner is liable for failing to provide a safe place for the use of the invitee.Thus, in Brody v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm by Heather Donkers
” – Nakatsuru J. in Morris, at para. 1 R v Morris is a sentencing decision delivered in the Ontario Superior Court by Justice S. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 11:17 am by Andrew Delaney
Not having any luck to speak of at the superior court level, he appeals. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 8:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released the decision in Working Families Ontario v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
They may have a glass of water, but nothing else to eat or drink, unless given permission, may take notes, as long as it does not interfere with the flow of evidence, and have blank paper available. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:28 am by Ralph L. Jacobson
Superior Court (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1628, 1634: “…collisions with other skaters in group skating sessions, and the injuries that may result therefrom, are inherent risks of the sport of figure skating. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 10:07 am by Michael Grossman
Despite these defenses, the facility recently filed a notice of settlement with the Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:54 am by Gabe Johnson-Karp
Although the Supreme Court has yet to release an opinion in American Electric Power v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 2:01 pm
Star-Brite Distributing, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Sapphire sought to recover millions of dollars for water damage, increased construction costs, delay costs, lost revenue, and other losses that the builder's risk policy allegedly covered or should have covered but the permanent policy did not. [read post]