Search for: "Wear v State" Results 421 - 440 of 4,733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2009, 3:04 am
Requiring a lifeguard applicant to take a swim test using a State issued "Speedo" swimsuit is not an act of unlawful discrimination because of ageMatter of Lester v New York State Off. of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation, 2009 NY Slip Op 01651, Decided on March 3, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe New York State Division of Human Rights dismissed Roy J. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 12:00 am
PROPERTY - POOL COLLAPSE - CAUSE OF LOSS - WEAR AND TEAR OR DETERIORATION - LIGHTNING Lynch v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:42 am by Wells Bennett
The long-running habeas case of Abdullah v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Though the taxpayer was required to purchase the clothing, thus satisfying the first condition, the court simply stated that “Ralph Lauren, however, is suitable for general or personal wear. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:53 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of MississippiOpinion Date: 6/1/10Cite: Peavey Electronics Corp. v. [read post]