Search for: "Wells v. Katz" Results 421 - 440 of 806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2013, 10:26 am by Venkat
CeridianFirst Circuit Rejects Data Insecurity Claims on the Basis of Article III Standing--Katz v PershingNew Essay: The Irony of Privacy Class Action LawsuitsAnother Data Loss Case Tossed on Article III Grounds--Whitaker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
Regarding damages, Katz found MUO proved it lost $5 million in the form of the BP site fee. . . [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:00 am by David Kris
  We would need to consider whether to distinguish between targets who are known or reasonably believed to be U.S. persons, those who are known or reasonably believed not to be U.S. persons, and those whose status is uncertain.[8]  In today’s world, nationality is often difficult to discern; even in 1978, FISA required assumptions about nationality that were largely based on location.[9] As location becomes more indeterminate, nationality may as well. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
That dubious point was rebutted well enough at the hearings by EFF-Austin board member Matt Henry (see his column in the Houston Chronicle) who compared the situation to US v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 8:00 am by Venkat
CeridianFirst Circuit Rejects Data Insecurity Claims on the Basis of Article III Standing--Katz v PershingNew Essay: The Irony of Privacy Class Action LawsuitsAnother Data Loss Case Tossed on Article III Grounds--Whitaker v. [read post]