Search for: "West v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 9,556
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
(The 1970s-era standing decision in question is United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:51 am
[7] West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
Naval Academy and West Point to continue to use, at least for now, race-conscious admissions programs. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
One year ago tomorrow, in West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
Third, because it opens the door to the kind of sloganising with which we have become all too familiar over the course of the Online Harms debate: the unregulated Internet; the Wild West Web; ungoverned online spaces. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Facts: This case (United States of America v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:17 am
Judges of Compensation will need to review each factual situation on a case-by-case basis to determine the prohibitions and entitlements of the DME so that the power balance is equalized in this pre-trial discovery procedure.DiFIORE v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 5:56 pm
The Hardwick class consists of every individual in the state of Ohio with measurable concentrations of certain PFAS chemicals. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
These negotiating mandates, presented before the NCOP Select Committee on 26 May 2023, indicated that out of the nine provinces, one (Free State) was in favour of the CAB passing without further amendments; seven (Eastern Cape, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, Mpumalanga, North West, and the Northern Cape) were in favour of the CAB passing subject to certain amendments; and one (the Western Cape) was against the CAB passing at all.As part of parliamentary procedure,… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
See 815 ILCS 205/2 (West 2020) (allowing for prejudgment interest in actions on an “instrument of writing” and several other circumstances); 4220 Kildare, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
State of California, Dept. of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 1:05 pm
The Russian mercenary leader Yevgeny V. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 2:17 pm
Following cases such as United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:27 am
LPL Financial LLC, Lexis Employment Classification—ABC Test and Exemptions—Constitutionality—Court of Appeal, affirming trial court’s judgment, held that Labor Code § 2783(d)(1) exemption from application of “ABC test” (first adopted in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
Last year’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
She said that the proposed rule is susceptible to legal challenges on various grounds, including that (1) the FTC may lack authority to engage in this type of substantive competition rulemaking based on the history of the FTC Act, (2) the rule is potentially barred under the “major questions doctrine” as recently addressed by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
