Search for: "Will v. Hughes"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2007, 7:33 am
Reedhycalog UK, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 8:34 pm
Vasilas v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am
R v Guraj – Back to the Future or Part of Something Bigger? [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:05 am
Sandford, Plessy v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
The court said that it is within the discretion of the family law court, and the moving party must provide proof by clear and convincing evidence (Cassarino v Cassarino 149 AD3d 689, Hughes v Kameneva 96 AD3d 845. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
In Mosley at para 229 Eady J directed himself to take into account awards in defamation cases, and referred also to Gleaner Company Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills are members of Matrix Chambers and authors of Online Publication Claims: a Practical Guide. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm
In the case of Lachaux v Independent Print ([2015] EWHC 2242 (QB)) Warby J gave judgement on preliminary issues including in relation to “serious harm” in a number of libel actions brought against three newspapers and the Huffington Post. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
By Hugh B. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
On appeal from: [2019] EWCA Civ 674 A majority of the Supreme Court has dismissed this appeal concerning the procedure for collective proceedings in competition damages claims, the first collective proceedings case of this kind to reach the Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:58 am
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 1513 This appeal considered whether the losses suffered by the Appellant were losses which the Respondent owed a duty to protect him against, and whether the losses suffered by the Appellant are otherwise recoverable from the Respondent. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
This is a live blog of the appeal brought by Mastercard concerning class certification under the UK’s collective action regime introduced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm
The Court considered the recent analysis of the English High Court’s power to grant injunctions in the case of Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Limited ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch))(see our discussion here). [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 1:34 pm
Nov. 22, 2012 Hughes, J.)Polacheck v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
Nov. 15, 2021 Hughes, J.), may be viewed at this LINK.The court Order in Harenza v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:32 am
Here, as the Supreme Court properly determined, an appeal from the order, inter alia, directing dismissal of the complaint in the underlying action was likely to succeed on the ground that the court in the underlying action improvidently exercised its discretion when it precluded the plaintiff’s experts from testifying entirely and directed dismissal of the complaint, rather than permitting the plaintiff’s experts to offer limited testimony based upon their review of other evidence in… [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 6:05 am
On Friday, July 27th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in GoPro, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:15 am
In Zeroclick, LLC v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 4:15 am
See Solutran, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 3:15 am
On March 13th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Cascades Projection v. [read post]
