Search for: "Williams v. Powers" Results 421 - 440 of 4,130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2020, 4:56 am by Jonathan H. Adler
California at the William and Mary Institute of Bill of Rights Law's 2020 Supreme Court Preview. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am by Josh Blackman
Such a law would not be a "proper" exercise of federal power because it intrudes upon state sovereignty. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Shapiro and Yeatman on brief in Oracle v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am by Jeremy Gordon
” In a lengthy footnote, it addresses perhaps the most powerful case marshalled by McKeever in support of his position: Haldeman v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Importantly, the opinion casts doubt on the EEOC’s powers to act by guidance in many other areas as well [Federalist Society teleforum with Mark Chenoweth and Eileen O’Connor on Texas v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm by Erik Gerding
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:02 pm by brian
” And hundreds of years later this same theory, operating under a different name, is first formally written into an American legal decision - Johnson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm by Sandy Levinson
  The final reading was an excellent new book, MAKING A NEW AMERICAN CONSTITUTION, by George William Van Cleve, currently a visiting scholar at Georgetown and the author of previous excellent books on American constitutional history. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 8:30 am
The Essay surveys the legacy of Epstein's 1985 book Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 8:44 am by Ronald Mann
The other would say that an action bringing the assets into the estate amounts to “augmentation,” and thus falls outside the power under the Court’s opaque 2012 decision in Stern v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Louis, IM & SR v Williams.3 Tenenbaum had argued that the court should follow the standard set out by the Supreme Court in punitive damages cases, specifically BMW v Gore,4 a far less deferential standard. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:32 am by William Consovoy
William Consovoy is a partner at Consovoy McCarthy PLLC, and counsel of record for the Project on Fair Representation, which filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]