Search for: "Willis v. Willis" Results 421 - 440 of 1,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2010, 12:30 am by Bystander
There is the Cracknell v Willis defence of challenging the breath machine (not much help in a urine sample case though) and myriad technical issues.I have seen offers of courses in motoring law for solicitors that make the point that this is one of the decreasing number of areas where the private individual is prepared to shell out hefty fees to try to stay on the road. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 10:06 am
Willis, currently a General District Court judge, were both elected to the 15th Judicial Circuit Court for eight-year terms. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 4:12 pm
Blagojevich is one sick, corrupt, Willie Stark like guy. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 9:48 pm
In this case, the movie is the recently released documentary "The Ballad of Willie and Lucille," which looks at the iconic contracts case of Peevyhouse v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:03 pm
In re the Marriage of Debbie Lynn Taylor and Willie James Taylor, Debbie Lynn Taylor, Petitioner-Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:22 pm by Josh Blackman
And while Bartenwerfer paints a picture of liability imposed willy-nilly on hapless bystanders, the law of fraud does not work that way. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 4:52 am by SHG
  Cynthia Willis of Central Point Oregon was denied a CWL the the Jackson County Sheriff because she uses medical marijuana. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:02 am by Robert A. Epstein
Believe it or not, the Rules Governing the Courts for the State of New Jersey contain an entire section specifically devoted to family law practice – Part V – Rules Governing Practice in the Chancery Division, Family Part. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am by David Kravets
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking was the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Notwithstanding the above, the court finds unconvincing defendants’ argument that they were obligated to withdraw after their investigation showed that the underlying tort claim was without merit (~ee Willis v Holder, 43 AD3d 1441, 1441 [4th Dept 2007] [conclusory assertiori that the underlying action lacks merit is insufficient to establish good and sufficient cause for withdrawal]). [read post]