Search for: "Witte v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 454
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
I don’t go there — it is the core proposition rejected by the Wittes letter. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Witte, supra; State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:20 pm
Commentary Eighteen months ago, the Supreme Court decided Boumediene v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
United States, a case initially brought in state court and removed by the government to federal court, challenging the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 11:40 am
In 2003, the Supreme Court declared state laws against consensual sodomy by same-sex couples to be unconstitutional, in Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
District Court in Boston under the name of Gill v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
Article II, § 2 identifies the President as the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’ and the Supreme Court has stated unequivocally that the President has the prerogative to establish rules and regulations for the armed forces. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:31 pm
Witt v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:40 am
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), (ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, David Spinoza Tanenhaus, ed., Gale, 2008).Amelia J. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:06 pm
United States; Shelby v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 5:21 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Willie Clark v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 8:10 pm
Witt Home Ranch, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
, (May 25, 2008).Frederick Mark Gedicks, Fundamentalism, Spirituality, and Church-State Relations in the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
Since that time almost every major military ally of the United States has revised its policy to allow openly-gay service members, but the political will to change the policy in this country has been lacking. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 21, 2008 Witt v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:33 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals said it was unclear whether the military's policy, as specifically applied to Witt, would hurt unit cohesiveness, as the Air Force had argued in winning its case in July 2006 in U.S. [read post]
21 May 2008, 4:46 pm
The Ninth Circuit reasoned:In United States v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:11 pm
Witt v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:03 am
United States (2003) 539 U.S. 166, finding them equally applicable here: Courts, however, must consider the facts of the individual case in evaluating the Government's interest . . . . [read post]
21 May 2008, 6:22 am
United States v. [read post]
