Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2016, 2:29 am
In giving the leading judgment Lord Neuberger first addressed the appellant’s claim that the refusal to allow them to claim benefits infringed their rights under the TFEU. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am
The Human Rights Act ‘generally excludes economic, social and cultural rights’[18] and the word ‘poverty’ is not mentioned in the Act. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 8:09 am
On 1, 2 and 3 February 2022, the Supreme Court heard the appeals in (i) Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v Compton Beauchamp Estates Ltd (the “Compton Beauchamp Appeal”); (ii) Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure v Ashloch Ltd & Anor (the “Ashloch Appeal”); and (iii) On Tower UK Ltd v AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd (the “On Tower Appeal”). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
> Versión en Word> Versión en PDFAceptamos aportes y sugerencias sobre la traducción***Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos de AméricaRoe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm
The Court was not prepared to invalidate the claim form on the basis of a legal fiction without express wording in the CPR. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
Lord Justice Leveson has heard his final witness of the year; the Parliamentary recess has begun; the Royal Courts of Justice is having its Christmas break. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
He has published intensively in the areas of contract law, private international law and international dispute resolution. 1) For those who have read the famous opinion of Lord Ellenborough in Buchanan v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 3:44 am
Furthermore, as discussed below, in attempting to reconcile G 2/21 with the Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert, Lord Justice Arnold (Arnold LJ) in Sandoz v BMS is forced to disagree with the interpretation that G 2/21 supports the established "lack of ab initio implausibility" standard. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:35 am
The meaning claimant attributes to these words is that he lied to the Select Committee about what he had been told by DI Maberly. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 11:31 am
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagreed on the inventiveness of expandable hoses. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 8:43 am
Lord Leggatt helpfully noted in his judgement that “in the absence of clear words the parties did not intend to derogate from the normal rights and obligations that a contract would give”. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:03 pm
In the words of Lord Diplock in Pettitt v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
I accept that, for the reasons explained by Jacob J in Bristol-Myers Squibb and Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen, courts should be cautious before relying upon prosecution history as an aid to construction. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
The words “meal ticket” do not appear anywhere in the speech, and Lord Wilson’s view is entirely consistent with the law as it presently stands, which requires judges to take into account all the circumstances before deciding on whether or not maintenance should continue and for how long / at what level: Another hot potato is the possibility under our current law for periodical payments to continue to be made by the husband to the wife for many years… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
Lord Hope added the comment that, although the scope and subject matter of the appeal was defined by the conclusions in the closure notice, s.50, TMA meant that the tribunal was not tied to the precise wording of the closure notice when hearing the appeal. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:58 am
This judgment is the last word on the subject. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
That defence was struck out in the County Court on the basis of Qazi v LB Harrow [2004] 1 AC 983, and subsequent appeals to the Court of Appeal and (a seven person) House of Lords were unsuccessful. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:24 am
This in our view would be more consistent with the approach the Supreme Court has recently taken in the area of contractual construction (for example, in the case earlier this year of Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36, where the Supreme Court held that where the words of a contract are clear, those words will be upheld even if the result appears to be contrary to commercial common sense). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 3:18 pm
Another unfounded action was Pitman Training Ltd & another v Nominet UK & another [1997] EWHC Ch 367, in which the real dispute was between two companies that shared the name "Pitman" because they were originally the two halves of the same business.The latest example of this malady is to be found in IPC Media Ltd v Media 10 Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 1439, is a Court of Appeal for England and Wales ruling of Lord Dyson MR, Lord Justice Kitchin and… [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am
The Supreme Court Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lady Black, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lady Arden dismissed the appeal on both points. [read post]
