Search for: "York v. South Carolina" Results 421 - 440 of 921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
But rounding out the top five for outmigration were New York, Massachusetts, South Carolina, and California—not, with the exception of South Carolina, a list of low-tax locales. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
 Kenneth Vanko answers both questions in his recent post on the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in Milliken & Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 3:04 pm
Is that, however, a proper function of the Church's mission -- to be a New York landlord? [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
Feb. 28, 2014)), Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and West Virginia. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm by Joey Fishkin
 The irony is rich: NAMUDNO itself pulled that principle out of a hat only by entirely inverting (in part through the device of a strategically placed ellipsis) the directly-on-point holding of South Carolina v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 11:23 pm by Rich Cassidy
Data for 9 states — Colorado, Iowa, Minnesota, New York, Nevada, South Carolina, Texas, Wisconsin, and Vermont – is available on the site at present. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:16 pm by Meg
(Side note: it was ridiculously exciting, as a recent escapee from south Florida, to go to an event in another state and be able to drive there in less than six hours.)Aside from transcription, formatting, and adding some links, these notes are presented as I took them - i.e., uncleaned up, sometimes random or unclear, and I've probably gotten a few things wrong or otherwise misrepresented them. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Sanders, “holding the Constitution’s command that the House of Representatives be elected ‘by the People’ requires that congressional districts be equal in population” New York Times v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:13 am
The South Carolina Appellate Law Blog says the decision creates an unworkable standard in After Philip Morris: What can a jury consider for punitive damages purposes? [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm by Erin Miller
Flores, the Court began to pull back from its historic endorsement of Congress’s broad powers as articulated in cases like South Carolina v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” And in North Carolina Dept of Revenue v. [read post]