Search for: "v. Holder et al" Results 421 - 440 of 924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2010, 2:18 am by gmlevine
The dissent in Loma Linda was the sole Panel in an earlier UDRP case, Loma Linda University Adventist Health Services Center, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 12:54 pm by Tobias Lutzi
In reaching its conclusion, the Court reiterated that Article 24(1) Brussels Ia does not encompass all actions concerning rights in rem in immovable property, but only those which both come within the scope of th Regulation and are actions which seek to determine the extent, content, ownership or possession of immovable property or the existence of other rights in rem therein and to provide the holders of those rights with protection for the powers which attach to their interest (Case C-722… [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:04 am
Webfeats, et al., Nos. 01-2648/2725 (6th Cir., February 7, 2003). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:00 pm
Justice Department Opposes New Google Book SettlementThis posting was written by Darius Sturmer, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.Despite the substantial progress reflected in the proposed amended settlement agreement in The Authors Guild Inc. et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
In Société Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S.A. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 12:03 pm
"Book Reviews: Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, Joseph Feller et al (editors). [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Humanitarian Law Project, et al. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:13 am by Walter Olson
” [Palm Beach Post via Radley Balko] On “unauthorized practice of law” as protective moat around profession’s interests, Britain does things differently [Gillian Hadfield via Andrew Sullivan; related, Larry Ribstein] Forthcoming book by Robert Crandall et al urges lawyer deregulation [Brookings] “The Treaty Clause Doesn’t Give Congress Unlimited Power” [Ilya Shapiro, Cato on Golan v. [read post]