Search for: "v. Murphy "
Results 421 - 440
of 3,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2013, 10:45 am
In the case of Murphy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 10:09 am
Respectfully, Senator Steven V. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:51 am
From Sida v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:13 pm
¶50 (quoting Reid v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:31 am
See Turner v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:23 am
A California Superior Court’s recent ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:24 pm
The facts of Murphy v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 4:41 pm
McKiver v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 9:09 am
Murphy v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
” I was thinking about the Murphy article, as I read Justice Thomas’s dissent in Brown v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 3:47 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Theodore J Folkman (Murphy & King, P.C.) has posted Gurung v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 6:39 pm
Kenneth Cole, and the July 2007 decision in White v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:51 am
Absence of the name of an individual on a list of members as required by law deemed evidence that the individual is not a member of the organizationMurphy v Town of Ramapo, 2010 NY Slip Op 09233, Decided on December 14, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentDennis Murphy, Jr., then a 16-year-old member of the "youth corps" of the Ramapo Valley Ambulance Corp. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
Carpenter v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 10:22 am
Murphy, Jr.Held: A claim under the Health Care Worker Whistleblower Protection Act is cognizable even if the plaintiff did not report an alleged violation to an external board and even if the employees committing such violation did not have authority to set company policy.Facts: The plaintiff worked for Montgomery Hospice, Inc. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 2:19 pm
Yet another good reason to have live-client, robust civil clinics. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:07 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
