Search for: ". Kerr"
Results 4381 - 4400
of 6,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2009, 12:35 am
A quick synopsis of the various positions: Serge Sasseville, Quebecor - welcomed C-61, need for digital copyright reform, support notice-and-notice for ISPs John Lawford, PIAC - danger of anti-circumvention without link to copyright infringement, legalize time and format shifting, notice-and-notice, possibility of lawful access creeping into copyright Jeremy deBeer, University of Ottawa - Canadian copyright law among the best in the world, market solution, fair dealing reform,… [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:25 am
Kerr (here, with Julio Colomba). [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:39 am
South Toms River Borough Municipal Court 144 Mill Street South Toms River, NJ 08757 Telephone: 732-349-1141; Facsimile: 732-240-3304 South Toms River Borough Municipal Court Judge Honorable Stacey Kerr, J.M.C. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:25 pm
The judgments were given by 21 different Judges as follows 7 judgments – Collins Rice J 6 judgments – Nicklin J 5 judgments – Steyn J 4 judgments – Johnson J, Heather Williams J and HHJ Lewis 3 judgments – Julian Knowles J, Pepperall J, Murray J and Farbey J 2 judgments – Hill J, Linden J, Saini J, Tipples J and Deputy Judge Allegre 1 judgment – Chamberlain J, Griffiths J, Kerr J, Ritchie J, Lavender J, Jay J. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:36 pm
(See, for example, a piece by Orin Kerr and the comments on The Volokh Conspiracy, a letter from Gizmodo’s lawyer to the police, and a very recent report from the Technology Chronicles that suggests the authorities have put the search of the taken objects on hold.) [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 12:52 pm
Senator Boxer's office has released the following:For Immediate Release Contact: Mary Kerr or Kate Gilman: 202-224-8832December 9, 2011 mary_kerr@epw.senate.gov or kate_gilman@epw.senate.gov U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:06 pm
Lord Kerr on the hand had difficulty finding a distinction between social security payments on the one hand and social welfare provision on the other (para.75). [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 12:10 pm
Peter Stockton was the senior investigator for the House of Representatives into the mysterious death of Karen Silkwood and the mysterious termination of the government investigations into Kerr-McGee's falsification of safety x-rays. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:40 am
Like Orin Kerr at Volokh, I still don't see that this is a big issue because the military has always had its own rules and never has factored into 8th Amendment evolving standards cases. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:35 am
Orin Kerr of the Volokh Conspiracy reports that the Kentucky Supreme Court has issued its decision on remand from the Court’s decision last Term in Kentucky v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 9:04 pm
See also Dvorak Uncensored and Orin Kerr. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 9:06 pm
[Steyn @ NRO Corner; reactions] Court rules Dan Rather suit against CBS can go to discovery [NYMag; earlier here, here] Served seventeen years in prison on conviction for murdering his parents, till doubts on his guilt grew too loud to ignore [Martin Tankleff case] Orin Kerr and commenters discuss Gomez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
., the Volokh Conspiracy (Orin Kerr); Wikipedia -- we've been forced to show our hand. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 4:08 am
"And at "The Volokh Conspiracy," Orin Kerr has a post titled "Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 7:52 pm
Orin Kerr argues, quite reasonably, thatthese numbers don’t reflect beefed up white collar enforcement as much as the realities of who the SDNY tends to hire. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:52 am
A recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) known as Kerr v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 2:22 am
Kerr, 53 F.3d 911 (8th Cir.1995) (majority view); Brandon v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:16 pm
("The Odd Couple," 03/25/10 Campbell Brown Blog) Law professor Orin Kerr complains about the perceived absence of comparable profiles of Charles Cooper, attorney for the Prop. 8 proponents. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:57 am
(Ben posted earlier on this point; Orin Kerr also has an especially helpful discussion over at Volokh.) [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:30 am
Lord Kerr, delivering judgment, held that even if a presumption exists that Parliament intends Carltona to apply, it was displaced by a proper interpretation of articles 4(1) and 4 (2) of the 1972 Order read together. [read post]
